POLL: is this still no-sew or low-sew?

hi friends!! i had a question come up during the testing of my latest pattern, and i was curious to see what the community thought!

my cauldron pop-it pattern is no-sew, so all of the pieces are either made together or crocheted directly onto the other pieces. one of my testers (not sure if they want to be tagged or not and get a bunch more notifications, but if so, i’ll edit the post! :grin:) found it easier to crochet the spider legs separately and then attach them afterward by leaving a long tail and pulling the yarn tails through the body and tying them to secure them, so it technically isn’t sewing them on, but i always thought that a pattern was considered low-sew if any of the pieces were made separately and then attached later, whether a darning needle/sewing needle was used or not.

so, i thought i’d make a poll to see what the community thinks! im definitely going to be including the tester’s feedback into the pattern as separate instructions (with credit, of course), as i know that crocheting directly onto a small plushie can be more difficult for some people, but i just wanted to see if you guys still considered this no-sew or if it’s low-sew! of course, i don’t think anyone is wrong in their opinion on this and it isn’t a big deal at all, i just was curious if i could still list the pattern as no-sew with these instructions as well without it coming across as misleading/false information.

i’d also love to hear your thoughts in the comments, since i feel like every crocheter might have a different definition of no-sew, low-sew, and high-sew! :grin: (also if the poll shows up broken, i’ll try to edit it to fix it :rofl:)

if pieces of a pattern (such as spider legs) are made separately and attached later, just by pulling the yarn ends through the plushie body and tying them, is it considered no-sew or low-sew?

  • it’s still no-sew!
  • it’s considered low-sew!
0 voters
19 Likes

Sewing to me is I need to weave the strand in and out of the piece multiple times. Pulling it through and tying it is not the same at all imo.

9 Likes

I would still consider it sewing bc in my mind, pulling a piece of yarn through a crocheted piece counts as sewing.

5 Likes

if you don’t have to actually sew anything, to me its no-sew

7 Likes

I think it’s still no-sew!

7 Likes

happy bday! (just noticed lol)

4 Likes

tyyyyy! my birthday cake had Nutella instead of frosting and
omg.
why does frosting even exist
Nutella is so much better

6 Likes

fr tho frosting is overrated

6 Likes

fr, but I dont really like nutella, so when we decorate cakes we use homemade whipped cream and keep it in the fridge

6 Likes

yummm
wouldn’t it melt and soak into the cake tho? :thinking:

5 Likes

when I was in 2nd grade I said that frosting was my favorite food XD

5 Likes

thats why fridge

4 Likes

that is the best sentence i’ve heard in a while
“that’s why fridge”

edit: we should also stop crowding up yarnomaly’s post lol

4 Likes

No sew means no sewing. Pulling yarn through and tying a knot is not sewing since you are not making stitches.

3 Likes

I think it’s technically still low-sew… No-sew universally means you either crochet it in, or surface crochet. (In my experience)

4 Likes

I also have a question quite similar, but what if the piece is already crocheted on, instead pulling the starting tail through the main piece to pin it down. is that considered no-sew?!

3 Likes

Perhaps call it no/low-sew?
nowsew lewsew

4 Likes

Interesting to see the results. Great question for sure.

2 Likes

im pretty sure that @ArielC uses that technique and considers it no sew?

2 Likes

Yeah, I didn’t consider it sewing because I didn’t need to use a sewing needle for it, but I’m not sure honestly :sweat_smile:

5 Likes